On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Todd Walton wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > There seem to be a number of people who read about CHKs and SSKs, and > > think thats all there is to freenet. I suppose it is somewhat > > understandable as our routing mechanism can be difficult for people to > > get their heads around, and NGR doesn't make that any easier. > > Are you kidding? I think NGRouting makes it *easier* to understand. The > number of logical relationships to understand is reduced, for one. For > another, it's like a simplified, toy model of economics, sharing a lot of > the same concepts, so someone who understands *that* well worked out field > already has a head start on understanding NGRouting.
That and the fact it can be expressed logically and not "Well, you multiply this by this number (that we made up) and this by this (pulled out of our ass) etc etc." NGR makes a hell of a lot more sense then the original routing... because the original routing was bits and pieces, all seperate. --Dan
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
