> NGR makes a hell of a lot more sense then the original routing... > because the original routing was bits and pieces, all seperate.
Well, if - by "original routing" - you include all of the load balancing kludges then yes, NGR is much more elegant, but I was referring to the core of the original routing algorithm as described in my original paper. Anyway, perhaps NGR is easier to understand - the point still remains that Entropy is basically a well decorated flying machine that doesn't fly until they come up with a good routing algorithm (and, of course they are welcome to use NGR - although if they did Entropy would basically become a C port of Freenet - which would be cool, but I am unsure if that is what they want to be). Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Weblog http://slashdot.org/~sanity/journal _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
