On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:03:04PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote: > On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 14:52, Toad wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:33:50PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote: > > > > > > I thought of a way to accept CPU load information: let > > > the web server to accept the load as a parameter on a URL, > > > and write a Perl script which finds the load and sends in > > > the GET request. Or maybe a simpler protocol: listen on > > > a port, accept a connection, and read load numbers from it. > > > > > > Then you don't have to do Java to C interfaces and use > ^^^^^ > > > a different C implementation for each OS. > > > > Ugh. [...] > > No, this is an interface where a web browser can submit > the CPU load information. Where Perl can be a web browser. > Or the user can manually claim what the load is by filling > in a form and submitting. (Maybe he wants freenet to use > less CPU without shutting down entirely).
That would depend on probabilistic rejection of course. So, is that useful for anything else? > > BTW do we have dynamically adjustable configuration parameters? > This would be one of them. Yes. We do. A small number of parameters can be changed in the config file, the node will see the change on the fly and update. See NodeConfigUpdater. We have the infrastructure for any param to be updated, but making them all updatable will be a fairly large if mostly easy job (and I have more important things to do at the moment). > > -- Ed Huff -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
