On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:23:30AM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > Toad wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:33:39AM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > > > >>The developers probably already know this, but I'm posting anyway. > >> > >>In 6220 I'm getting no connections transmitting, and no successful > >>inbound search requests. On a lighter note, my outbound bw is at full > >>throttle (10k/s), and my local mean queries per hour is down to a > >>reasonable 15,000. > >> > >>Here's a sampling of exceptions in my log: > >> > >>02:22:55 Unexpected exception java.lang.NullPointerException in > >>SendData Sending Data @ 104b483bd9d26513: > >>104b483bd9d26513/acd610a9a6d8bef6: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED], in=Key: <snip> Buffer: > >>freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$ExternalNativeBuffer@:0x1 : > >><snip>:committed:1050081:ffffffffffffffff New: false ( 16384 of 1049900 > >>read), moved=12288/1049900, partSize=16384,result=-1 (inWrite=true) > >>java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > > >Are you sure this does not include a stack trace? > > It might very well have. I was just taking a random sample from it. > I'll grab the latest unstable and then try to give you a more complete > log. Also, I'll change my freenet.ini from > > outLimitCutoff=0.65 > > back to: > > %outLimitCutoff=0.90 > > I had changed it to stop the relentless queueing of outgoing data and > reduce the number of transmitting connections I was getting in 6215. > (That was done on Ed's suggestion, and seemed to work---i'm sure you'll > come up with a more elegant fix.) > > > > > > >If so, we can't do much about it - but I got lots of them when I tried to > >run the node on a JVM with -server rather than -client. > > Not sure what you mean (maybe I don't need to know). > > > > > > >>02:22:56 Dropping send on CB 0x85 (CB_CACHE_FAILED), on chain > >>acd610a9a6d8bef6 for freenet.node.states.request.SendingReply: > >>key=<snip>, hopsToLive=24, id=acd610a9a6d8bef6, > >>routes=null,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@1065345776156 > >>null > > > > > >Unfortunate. If frequent, bad. > > Just curious: which part is the unfortunate part?
The fact that the send connection died. It could indicate a deeper problem or just TCP/network/node connection overload problems. > > > > > > >>02:23:35 Unexpected exception java.lang.NullPointerException in > >>SendData Sending Data @ 6d805bf1ac25860e: > >>6d805bf1ac25860e/3b2bbc4019e0ef0: send=freenet.OutputStreamTrailerWriter The stack trace would have been really useful. :( > > > >GX/[EMAIL PROTECTED], in=Key: <snip> Buffer: > > > >>freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$ExternalNativeBuffer@:0x1 : > >><snip>:temp:1050081:5dcd1aafb9e7b95b New: true ( 16384 of 1049900 read), > >>moved=15371/1049900, partSize=16384,result=-1 (inWrite=true) > >>java.lang.NullPointerException > >>02:23:35 Send failed, cache broken! for > >>freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply: key=<snip>, hopsToLive=24, > >>id=3b2bbc4019e0ef0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>(<snip>,request),ft@ [EMAIL PROTECTED], > >>routedTime=1065345148296, replyTime=1065345161093 null > > > > > >Ouch. > > Ouch because "cache broken"? or about that weird gmane stuff? What is > that anyway? Ouch because of "cache broken". > > -Martin > > P.S. Am I correct to "<snip>" away the keys from the log before sending? > I'm just trying to not break anonymity. Yes, probably. I don't bother, because it's all encrypted anyway. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
