On October 27, 2003 08:45 pm, Toad wrote: > Ok, so the proposal: > > Keep the current failure table. It should probably be made very large. > > Create a large secondary failure table. Keys in this table will still be > routed, but are not counted for statistical purposes, nor do they affect > estimators, making the psuccess more accurate, but meaning a large fraction > of traffic is simply not counted in the psuccess at all, and we will be > making "disposable" requests, which don't affect the estimators.
I read this to mean it should effect some of the estimators but not not pDNF. > Hrrm. This is very interesting. Anyone see an obvious reason not to do > it? It does sound interesting. Maybe we should make it switch able. Ed _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
