--- Nick Tarleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Maybe just XOR with a randomly chosen node-private
> value. But won't this fubar 
> routing and specialization, if each node has a
> different ordering in its 
> routing? Or do I misunderstand what is meant by
> "estimator keyspace"?
> -- 

Since the ordering of keys in the estimator keyspace
is completely arbitrary anyway the answer is no, but
with some caveats:

1) A current node's routing would be screwed up if
this was implemented all at once (this would probably
screw up the entire network if enough nodes did this
at the same time).  An existing node would have to be
converted slowly.  Not a problem with a new node (with
the exception of #2 below).

2) I believe NGR allows this information to be shared
with a new node to help them integrate into the
network.  This would cause a problem because either
the estimators would be scrambled (and therefore
useless) or you would have to reveal the mapping
function (which a cancer node could use to DoS a key).
 So each node would have to keep some unscrambled
references to pass on to other nodes.

Actually, I withdraw my last proposal.  I think this
one would work much better.  So the two proposals for
thwarting Toad's key DoS scenario are:

1) Hash-cash - works by making requesters pay a price
for each request.

2) Estimator keyspace reordering - works by scattering
requests across the entire estimator keyspace.

I think either solution would do the job.  Any other suggestions?

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to