On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:30:58PM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> > >>The real question is: how much of your outgoing bw
> > >>is used up by QR:s, how much is used by routing requests, and how much
> > >>is used up by "real" data.  I wish I knew how to tell this.
> > >
> > >
> > > Check  outputBytes* in the diagnostics. Low is actual data (trailers)
> and
> > > the others mostly are things like DataRequests and QRs and other things
> > >
> >
> > Lemme make sure I understand this.
> >
> >  From servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/outputBytesLow/minute:
> >  >Events Value Change    Mean Total Value        Mean Time Between Events
> >  >2072   578015          1.3937197026238224E8    29.047779922779924
> >
> >  From servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/outputBytes/minute:
> >  >Events Value Change    Mean Total Value        Mean Time Between Events
> >  >386    649802         1.6627010963104272E8    155.36010362694302
> >
> > That means that in one minute, I sent out 578015 "real" data bytes and
> > 649802 total?  If so, my node is doing very well sending data, despite
> > the large number of QR:s!
> 
> Exactly the same conclusion that I seem to come to whenever I check my
> node:s status :) And... some of those outputBytes that isn't prio 'Low'
> might be data too.. I think it works something like: when a trailer has
> waited long enough it will be escalated to a higher prio..

Not any more IIRC. However .. a packet containing only QRs would be at
Low... ah shite. :)
> 
> /N

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to