On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:05:24AM -0500, Ken Corson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:10:10PM -0500, Ken Corson wrote: > >I've been thinking more about this concern. What I really want to > >observe is - for any given request that I forward, _how_many_ rejections > >occur before my request is able to hop (accepted). If this number is > >averaging something over about 5, this could be SEVERELY damaging to > >our NGR "specialized" routing intentions ... > > Toad responded: > >I doubt it's less than that... I'll trace a few high HTL requests > >through my log files... I wonder if there is a stat... if there isn't > >there should be... > > Toad- > Thank you so much for implementing searchFailedCount! My numbers > by hour (trimmed to reduce width) are this so far : > > 9:00:00 PM EST 0.95897 2.10480 0.0 17.0 390 > 10:00:00 PM EST 2.44145 4.04589 0.0 18.0 2041 > 11:00:00 PM EST 2.93011 3.45867 NaN NaN 1989 > 12:00:00 AM EST 3.23421 3.76093 0.0 19.0 2297 > 1:00:00 AM EST 4.21296 4.11976 NaN NaN 1681 > 2:00:00 AM EST 3.68234 3.65358 0.0 20.0 1807 > 3:00:00 AM EST 2.23778 3.04152 0.0 15.0 3049 > > What can I say ? Probably it's time for me to shut up about the > impact of QR !! I mentioned a strange phenomenon in how my node > (many nodes?) seems to "surge" it's rate of rejecting. What I > have gleaned from looking at individual searchFailedCount > events, then inboundQueryRejecteds, and finally > outboundAggregateRequests is that my outbound requests are also > fluctuating to a high degree (unsure how much this matters). > They certainly are not smoothly distributed in time, but I'll > have to monitor it some more. > > Thank you again for adding this :) > > I don't think the implications of the numbers above are serious - > at least when using 50 peers. Fewer peers, greater impact. Does > my (bad) theory about poor routing maybe suggest that > maxRoutingSteps should not exceed a small fraction of rtMaxNodes ? > > Looks like the only way for me to earn some developer points > is to start writing some code :) I sure thought I had something > here, but I guessed my extrapolated math wouldn't hold water.
I'm not sure. I think it could still be a problem. > > -Ken -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
