So you are suggesting that the reason that routing sucks is that nodes constantly reject 80%+? Perhaps you are right, but from what I have seen the rejection is mostly because of bandwidth usage... is that the consensus? Why do your nodes reject, people?
Frank v Waveren wrote:
Does it matter why we reject? If we reject 80% of queries, that means that queries have an 80% chance of not getting routed to the node NGR suggests they should go to.
My "layperson's math speak" may offend some, but here goes anyway:
at 80% , for every Q I accept, I turn 4 others down.
Putting it a different way (weak math-substitute appears here), at each hop, 4 QR's will occur, then the fifth attempt succeeds.
at 90% , 9 QR's will occur, then the 10th attempt succeeds.
at 95% , 19 QR's occur, before the 20th attempt succeeds.
We only have 50 peers (and 40 maxRoutingSteps) before we get exhausted from all this work. So if we exceed a 97.5% failure rate, it's probably time to throw in the towel on this whole Freenet project thing.
So I'm still wanting to know, for most nodes, do they see numbers below 0.200000 in the Ratio column of
http://localhost:8888/servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/localQueryTraffic/hour
( sorry for adding to the already heavy traffic of late in this list of devil's mailings )
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
