On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:52:42PM -0500, Daves Lists wrote: > One thing I've noticed is that the default config seems to overload on lower > end CPU's. The 4 machines I've installed(750 Duron, 1g athlon, 2xPIII750, > 4xPIIXEON450) all QR about 80% of the requests. If I drop the max > connections to 256 and increase the threads to 300 I only QR about 20% of > the time and the machines don't run at 100% processor. However most of the > nodes I talk to are QRing me about 40-60% of the time still. It seems like > with the current defaults it uses more resources QRing than processing > searches. I've fixed my node but probably 80% of normal users don't even > look at the config file or would have any idea how to tweak it. Defaults > should not assume that the users have the latest and greatest hardware.
We get OOMs and so on with maxthreads=300, not to mention that it's pretty user hostile. And reducing the maxnodeconnections should (well, theoretically) increase load rather than reducing it. If the dominant reason for load is that too many threads are used, that's a relatively straightforward matter of doing more NIO. I rather suspect that poor routing is primarily caused, as it always has been IMNSHO, by most nodes queryrejecting 80%+. > > Dave -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
