On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, [iso-8859-1] Some Guy wrote:

> Here's a neat paper Zooko (the MNet guy) pointed out:
> http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/douceur02sybil.html They argue you'd need a
> central authority to prevent a sybil attack.  I think they're wrong.

The author's claim is negative: he proves that given a reasonable set of
assumptions, it is impossible for a large network without a certification
authority to prevent a single attacker from successfully masquerading as a
number of users.  Once one or more attackers have done so, they can then
expand their foothold by endorsing one another as well as other new
attackers.

His analysis applies to any large-scale p2p network.  There are at least
two defenses: either create some sort of certification authority (perhaps
a supervisory p2p network) or allow/encourage fragmentation of the target
network.

--
Jim Dixon  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   tel +44 117 982 0786  mobile +44 797 373 7881

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to