On November 18, 2003 09:48 pm, Toad wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:47:03PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > On November 18, 2003 05:29 pm, Toad wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:00:27PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it seems to build > > > > up pretty high values in the connection manager's 'Data waiting to be > > > > transfered' counter. It's constantly around 30MiB, and that's more > > > > than the link can do in an hour under optimal conditions - I don't > > > > believe this makes sense. Or does it? > > > > > > > > Is there any way to get more sensible numbers? > > > > > > > > I've tried opening a lot of freesites, and they always seem to > > > > restart. However, some give me the "The request couldn't even make it > > > > off of your node." message, on a node that wasn't reseeded for > > > > months. > > > > > > > > Is this related? > > > > > > > > I get the feeling that the behaviour has worsened in recent versions, > > > > it used to work nicely around 632x. > > > > > > I suspect this is because we reinstated the QR based on bandwidth code. > > > > Without the QR based on bandwidth code I had about 200MB queued in the > > OCM on 100-200 connections - all going thru a 10K pipe... It will take > > it a long long long time to send all that data. > > It doesn't matter. Slow data is better than no data. And NGRouting is > quite capable of routing around slow nodes. What is HARD is dealing with > QueryRejected's.
I will agree with this to some extent. However it _does_ matter when we need 5 mins to send a 16K file and this is happening on lots of nodes. Is not this what happened when the switch was off, so its not the solution either. Ed _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
