> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin > Stone Davis > Sent: den 19 november 2003 10:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [freenet-dev] Re: High 'Data waiting to be transfered' > > > Toad wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:46:19PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > > > >>Toad wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:00:27PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it > seems to build > >>>>up > >>>>pretty high values in the connection manager's 'Data waiting to be > >>>>transfered' counter. It's constantly around 30MiB, and > that's more than > >>>>the > >>>>link can do in an hour under optimal conditions - I don't > believe this > >>>>makes sense. Or does it? > >>>> > >>>>Is there any way to get more sensible numbers? > >>>> > >>>>I've tried opening a lot of freesites, and they always seem to > >>>>restart. However, some give me the "The request couldn't > even make > >>>>it off of your node." message, on a node that wasn't reseeded for > >>>>months. > >>>> > >>>>Is this related? > >>>> > >>>>I get the feeling that the behaviour has worsened in recent > >>>>versions, it used to work nicely around 632x. > >>> > >>> > >>>I suspect this is because we reinstated the QR based on bandwidth > >>>code. > >> > >>Can you explain how that follows? I remember that before that code > >>was > >>reinstated, I had 300-400 transmitting connections, and my > output bw of > >>trailers was reduced down to about 50% of total. Now I > trasmit on about > >>30 connections and the trailer bw is about 90% of total. > > > > > > No. Bandwidth, # transfers, is better. Routing is worse. > > By what measure is routing worse? > > Can you show how removing bandwidth-based-QR would improve "routing" > without harming the network as a whole by reducing bandwidth and # of > transfers?
NGR is designed to take into account a nodes available bw and include that fact in routing decisions. Instead of overloading an already overloaded (bw-wise) node even more NGR would be sending the Q to another node. A bw-caused QR will completely hide the actual bw problem from other nodes' NGRT:s since the 'load' that is actually causing a QR includes multiple other factors. /N _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
