On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:55:04AM -0300, Caco Patane wrote: > So, bzip2...
bzip2 is slow (to compress). Gzip is fastest, but 7zip appears to me (entirely subjectively) to be faster than bzip2. > > On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> High level question: Why is it necessary to support several =20 > >>> compression standards? > >> > >>I'm not sure either that it is a good idea. > >> > >>NextGen$ > > > >I think we should only support ONE compression scheme. It should be fairly > >STANDARD, read: _100%_ of other languages (c, cpp, cs, php, perl, lisp, > >whatever) should have a library for this codec. It does not need to have > >the best compression ratio, a fairly good is good > >enough. it should be somewhat speedy and nice to CPU and RAM resources. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
