On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:00:27PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Hmmm, okay. Well will it - either the add-to-least-full-bucket or > > add-to-most-full-non-full-bucket be fair if we only take into account > > the number of tokens available, and not the queued/running requests? > > I don't see why not - we're still controlling the number of requests > each peer can send us via the token buckets.
And if they don't finish, we won't relay tokens to the incoming peers. Ok. > > Cheers, > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
