On 10 Aug 2006, at 09:38, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:27:32AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On 10 Aug 2006, at 04:06, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: It seems to me that you've just re-introduced the array that was removed in r10005, a changeset that seems to be the result of deciding that generating raw HTML is bad for some reason and replacing it with something more complicated, but with no clear to me advantage.
While not familiar with the details, I assume the motivation is to separate the controller from the view. This helps because it means that a designer can modify the appearance of fproxy without editing Java code, and will also help with internationalization.
That's CSS's job isn't it? Although I do like the changes.
CSS can change style and to some degree it can change layout, but not actual text or overall structure. It is bad practice to tie the text into the code (it hinders internationalization for one thing).
Ian.
|
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
