On Thursday 10 August 2006 13:06, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > It seems to me that you've just re-introduced the array that was > removed in r10005, a changeset that seems to be the result of > deciding that generating raw HTML is bad for some reason and > replacing it with something more complicated, but with no clear to me > advantage.
PeerNodeStatus has nothing to do with the HTML generation. It's for
having a consistent state during page generation which should be less
confusing to the user.
David
pgpjsapJ3XMD1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
