On 15 Oct 2006, at 16:14, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
This isn't a good idea, I agree with Dave Baker, it is patronizing, and reminiscent of the kind of attitude that leads to things like DRM. If a user decides that they want to remove a connection, it isn't our business to tell them they can't. Anyway, connection churn is much more likely to be due to nodes going up and then going down permanently, than people removing peers prematurely. If I could state a general principal here, remember that our software is just a guest on the user's computer. If they tell it to do something, it should do it. We have no business second guessing users. Ian. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog |
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
