* Volodya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-16 08:12:54]: > Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: > > * Dave Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-15 20:57:57]: > > > >> On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Author: nextgens > >>> Date: 2006-10-14 11:57:08 +0000 (Sat, 14 Oct 2006) > >>> New Revision: 10661 > >>> > >>> Modified: > >>> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/DarknetConnectionsToadlet.java > >>> Log: > >>> Small hack on fproxy to deny node removal if there isn't one week of > >> inactivity. > >> > >> Is there a particular reason for this? Surely if a user is removing an > >> active > >> node, they're doing it for a reason. This strikes me as very patronising. > > > > Fighting against network churn... I'm not sure a big warning would be > > efficient enough :| > > > > Maybe I should even do a step forward : remove the "disable" > > feature and let only BurstOnly and ListenOnly. > > Please do not do that. What if i suspect one of my friends of being not > really a friend,
What do you mean there? you have friends that aren't really friends? > i'll have to delete my own node to disconnect from an in that case. keep in mind that it only affects fproxy ;) > That will surely create more of a churn, and will probably cause people to > leave freenet > all the way. -- NextGen$. "On peut obéïr aux lois en souhaitant qu'elles changent, comme on sert à la guerre en souhaitant la paix." Merleau Ponty - L'éloge de la philosophie _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
