Robert Hailey wrote: > Prioritizing accepted messages over bulk data may help this case, but > the more general solution would be to prioritize data less than control > packets, no? Find the data fast (Request/DF/DNF/RNF/...), transfer it > slow (packetTransmit/???).
We'd have to be careful not to let the low-priority traffic starve, otherwise we'd keep accepting new requests while existing transfers repeatedly got pushed to the back of the queue and eventually timed out. Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
