On Friday 11 January 2008 21:22, Robert Hailey wrote:
> 
> On Jan 11, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 
> > Are you interested in implementing message priorities? MessageItem and
> > PacketSender are the most relevant classes.
> 
> I'll certainly do the grunt work of putting in the priority constants  
> and accessors in (r17019), but I kinda don't want to touch  
> FNPPacketMangler/PacketSender.

It's really not hard (look at the middle of PacketSender.run(), where it 
calculates the deadlines), but if you don't want to do it I will.
> 
> Also, the packet acknowledgements appear to be a lower level than the  
> message queue.

True.

Attachment: pgpFlRhCNnz33.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to