On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:

Nice. Are you fairly sure this works? Have you done at least some testing on it? I'm of half a mind to say revert it until after alpha 2 (this week) in
the interests of stability, you see...

I have tested it, in the little simulator (20 nodes) and am running this on my node now. The simulator works fine (CHK), my node has locked up once with pInstantReject=100%{Outputbandwidth liability}, but I am not sure if it was running pre or post r17192 (forgot to set this.status), so I just restarted it. Given the nature of r17192, the symptoms make sense (thinking that every request is a failure for byte logging).

I did think that it may have been a bit ambitious to get in the alpha, but the only thing that really concerns me is if any of a unregisterRequestSender() is missing. Previously it was *easy*, if the thread quit, you unregister it. Closely related to applyByteCounts() now... if one is forgotten it is a minor memory leak, and a big stats error.

I also had a queue-per-priority patch, but I clobbered the diff and was to frustrated to re-implement it :(

--
Robert Hailey

On Monday 21 January 2008 19:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: robert
Date: 2008-01-21 19:17:14 +0000 (Mon, 21 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 17190

Modified:
  trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/xfer/BlockTransmitter.java
  trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/RequestHandler.java
  trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/RequestSender.java
Log:
use callback for requestSender status; now only 1 thread per- request (rather
than 2)


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to