On Tuesday 22 January 2008 22:58, Juiceman wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 5:53 PM, Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Jan 22, 2008 5:20 PM, Robert Hailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > To clarify, I meant that upon realizing the pInstantReject, I restarted
> > > it w/ post r17192 for testing; not that I ignored it. Thus far (1 hour, 
35k
> > > requests) I have not had any problems.
> > >
> > >
> > I ran it yesterday but had to revert back to stable.  My node was only
> > using 40 or so threads, had 10 "transfers" but had over 400 SSK request
> > handlers running!  Bandwidth usage was about 50% of normal.  It was up for
> > at least 4hrs before I killed it.
> > It didn't look right to me, and since I run a seednode I couldn't leave it
> > like that.  It deserves some more testing time in trunk, but I wouldn't
> > release it right away.
> >
> 
> I will load r17200 and see if the problem reoccurs.

17202 please.

Attachment: pgph4uo06yz8k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to