* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-31 17:37:41]: > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:33, Florent Daignière wrote: > > * Robert Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-22 18:21:14]: > > > > > So it sounds like it will be about as secure as it currently is, but a > > > lot more efficient. 5 to 3 is a big difference. > > > > ... On a small, ideal network. > > On a larger, messier network, it should make *more* difference. That is, if > routing is the problem.
Am I the only one thinking that routing isn't the problem but churn is?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
