Florent Daignière wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-31 17:37:41]: > >> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:33, Florent Daignière wrote: >>> * Robert Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-22 18:21:14]: >>> >>>> So it sounds like it will be about as secure as it currently is, but a >>>> lot more efficient. 5 to 3 is a big difference. >>> ... On a small, ideal network. >> On a larger, messier network, it should make *more* difference. That is, if >> routing is the problem. > > Am I the only one thinking that routing isn't the problem but churn is?
Perhaps we should collect some empirical data - uptime of opennet peers, hop counts of probe requests (which should be routed like normal requests)? Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
