On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:32, Jusa Saari wrote: > And you won't get new ones to replace them, since the installer (both the > java and the tar.gz ones) is broken, or at least didn't work when I > tried to reinstall Freenet recently on Linux. Apparently, it fails to set > the execute bit of some scripts to on.
I didn't say reinstall, I said run the update script. What exactly is it that happens? The linux install script doesn't set update.sh/update.cmd as executable? You try to reinstall over an existing installation and it fails? What? > > Might want to check that one out. > > Oh, and the wrapper complains that it can't execute JVM when it attempts > to relaunch the node after a hang, and consequently never does, but I > guess that's a minor issue :(. It sucks, but the problem is probably in the wrapper's code, and would likely take a long time to fix ... if it's not a widespread problem, it's better to ignore it, and fix whatever is causing the JVM to hang in the first place. Please file bugs on the bug tracker for your bugs, and include enough detail! > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:27:05 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > We have widespread reports of serious problems with 1165: failure to > > bootstrap on opennet, etc. This seems to be caused by the > > NullPointerException's in PeerNode that was fixed weeks ago in trunk but > > never released. I should have done a release at the time with only that > > change. Anyway, 1166 is now available. If you have this bug (manifested by > > continual ERRORs about NullPointerException's in the logs, and probably a > > failure to connect to, or at least to communicate with, opennet peers), > > you will probably have to upgrade manually using update.sh / update.cmd. > > It is also possible that your update.sh/update.cmd is old and broken; it > > should update itself and then work, but if it doesn't, please fetch a new > > version from here: https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/update.sh > > https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/update.cmd (Add .sig to get > > automated gpg sigs) > > > > PLEASE UPGRADE ASAP! > > > > If this is as bad as it looks we may have lost a _lot_ of users through > > it. :< > > > > I'm sorry ... I should have pushed a release out as soon as the NPE was > > fixed. We haven't had consistent strong bug reports until today though... > > we have had some very worrying signs relatively recently though. And I > > haven't been following FMS, since the version that I was using has been > > deprecated and I haven't got around to reviewing a current version yet; > > that probably didn't help either. > > > > Please forward this message to FMS._______________________________________________ Devl mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [email protected] > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > >
pgph1b7fGqlVK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
