On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:16:15 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:32, Jusa Saari wrote: >> [quoted text muted] > > I didn't say reinstall, I said run the update script. > > What exactly is it that happens? The linux install script doesn't set > update.sh/update.cmd as executable? You try to reinstall over an existing > installation and it fails? What?
I tried a clean install and it failed, due to none of the .sh files getting their execute bit set, after which the installer complained that the JVM is buggy and recommended using Sun's JVM, except that I already was (1.6.0_05, since then I've updated to _10). >> [quoted text muted] > > It sucks, but the problem is probably in the wrapper's code, and would > likely take a long time to fix ... if it's not a widespread problem, it's > better to ignore it, and fix whatever is causing the JVM to hang in the > first place. > > Please file bugs on the bug tracker for your bugs, and include enough > detail! I'm investigating the wrapper issue myself for now. There was also some complains in wrapper.log about the version of the wrapper's JAR file (which doesn't seem to exist, BTW), so I got the latest version from tanukisoftware.com and am now seeing if the problem goes away, or if I at least can figure out what is happening. And it doesn't necessarily take a JVM hang to cause this effect; hibernating the machine for night also causes the wrapper to restart the JVM as soon as the machine resumes. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
