On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:47 PM, M <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand that javascript has to be disabled because of the > multitude of security holes it could open up. I was wondering if anyone > had ever thought about a freenetscript similar to how facebook > implemented FBML and FBJS to allow developers lots of scope for > functionality whilst stopping phishing attacks.
I did propose something similar in the past. But some developers think it is far better to have a JavaScript parser/filter. -- a "good" one, not a "complete" one. . [it can not be comepleted, for it is a proven equivalent to the halting problem] > The FreenetScript could be parsed by FProxy and turned into regular > javascript with freenet-only links. > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [email protected] > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
