On Wednesday 29 April 2009 21:36:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:15:43 xor wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:52:03 Ian Clarke wrote: > > > Are we sure having separate projects for "staging" and "official" in > > > github is the right way to organize this? I don't see any other > > > projects on github organized in this way. Shouldn't they be separate > > > branches or something, not entire separate projects? > > > > > > Ian. > > > > Mmh yes it is annoying to keep separate projects I guess: For example the > > build.xml must be corrected for each project: > > > > - Fred-staging/Fred-official need different build files. > > They do? Why?
The ant builder ("New builder") has a configured build file of:
"${workspace_loc:/fred-staging/build.xml}"
OR
"${workspace_loc:/fred-official/build.xml}"
>
> > - WoT / Freetalk rely on Fred so the project name on which they are
>
> dependent
>
> > will not fit depending on whether you have checked out staging or
> > official
>
> of
>
> > Fred.
>
> Why is this a problem? Just rename the directory! (Or on a sensible
> operating system use a directory symlink).
I did so, yes. Not really a problem you just have to be smart enough to do so.
And the last time I renamed the directory it screwed egit up. The safest way
is to rename before checking out. Or to reconfigure the project dependancies of
Freetalk / WoT.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
