On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:51:45 xor wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 April 2009 21:36:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:15:43 xor wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:52:03 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > > Are we sure having separate projects for "staging" and "official" in
> > > > github is the right way to organize this? I don't see any other
> > > > projects on github organized in this way. Shouldn't they be separate
> > > > branches or something, not entire separate projects?
> > > >
> > > > Ian.
> > >
> > > Mmh yes it is annoying to keep separate projects I guess: For example
the
> > > build.xml must be corrected for each project:
> > >
> > > - Fred-staging/Fred-official need different build files.
> >
> > They do? Why?
>
> The ant builder ("New builder") has a configured build file of:
> "${workspace_loc:/fred-staging/build.xml}"
> OR
> "${workspace_loc:/fred-official/build.xml}"Ugh. Well the project can be called anything... > > > > > > - WoT / Freetalk rely on Fred so the project name on which they are > > > > dependent > > > > > will not fit depending on whether you have checked out staging or > > > official > > > > of > > > > > Fred. > > > > Why is this a problem? Just rename the directory! (Or on a sensible > > operating system use a directory symlink). > > I did so, yes. Not really a problem you just have to be smart enough to do so. > And the last time I renamed the directory it screwed egit up. The safest way > is to rename before checking out. Or to reconfigure the project dependancies of > Freetalk / WoT. Aaaargh. Well, egit sucks, we have established this. git itself doesn't care what the directory is called.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
