On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Florent Daignière <[email protected]> wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <[email protected]> [2009-05-30 11:55:17]: [....] >> - Database-backed PHP for MANTIS. I don't think we should get rid of MANTIS. > > I do think we should; three main reasons: > - mantis is just not adapted to our usage anymore (We don't have > one single tree anymore) > - most reported bugs don't apply > - It's really a high-maintenance cost application... > Administrating mantis, patching it, keeping it up to date is a > PITA > > What about using github's issue tracking thingy instead? >
GitHub's issue tracking thingy don't even handle dependency of bugs, no real categories (just tags), no milestone thing, no release management... --- this is even worse then what MANTIS has. Most of the github users use LightHouse (http://lighthouseapp.com/), but I have not used it either... Anybody have experience with hosted bug trackers? _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
