On Wednesday 06 Mar 2013 21:29:58 irfan mir wrote: > Hello, > I was talking to Steve yesterday and he updated those on chat with my > progress on the development of the Freenet Security Setup. > > It was brought to his attention and the he shared it with me the > possibility for changing the design so only the security options that the > potential user can choose are shown instead of all of them. > > The options that the potential user can choose are determined by two simple > questions that the user answers before seeing the options of > the potential levels of security. > > So, I looked into this and found out that it is thought about being a > better user experience if the user is asked simpler questions and then > brought to the security setup. > Therefore, I modified the design and am now showing the mailing-list for > comments, feedback, and approval. > > This time, I made quick mock-ups that get the idea across as it was brought > to my attention that in the past others have provided shiny designs, but > not development. That made me feel sad and I decided I am going to work on > the interaction design and development more than the visual aspects form > now on and do as much as I can and know how to do. > > The mockups and descriptions of what is happening are as follows: > > This is a mockups of the structure of the security setup when it loads: > http://cl.ly/image/0O0d0H3Z2C39 > > I was thinking about changing the questions to ' I know someone who runs > Freenet ' and ' I use full-disk encryption ' to make it more clear that > checking / ticking the checkboxes answers the questions. > What do you think? > > Also, the ' question-mark icon ' in the lower-right corner of the above > mockup provides the user some assistance if they are confused by the > questions. On hover of that question-mark a tooltip appears explaining that > answering these questions allow for the appropriate security options to be > displayed and clicking goes straight to all the security options. > > If the user leaves both checkboxes unchecked, as far as my understand goes, > they can only have Low Security so that is all that is offered to them: > http://cl.ly/image/2p2r0I0Q191I > > If the user checks one of the boxes, they get more options to choose from: > http://cl.ly/image/3E23290N241R > > If the user checks both boxes, they are presented with all the options: > http://cl.ly/image/1f1O0W3N333H > > And, lastly, upon checking or selecting one of the security options, in > this case ' Low Security ', input-fields appear underneath for the users to > entre their security preferences: http://cl.ly/image/3J2h0n081732 > > I appreciate all and any feedback and comments so feel free to share your > thoughts.
If they know somebody on Freenet then they will need to choose between low (connect to strangers as well) and high (only connect to friends). If they don't then only low (actually NORMAL as network seclevel) is available. If they don't check the full disk encryption box, they can set a password. That's about it afaics?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
