On Tuesday 12 Mar 2013 19:42:28 irfan mir wrote: > Okay, thank you for the feedback! I feel this a good discussion that is > taking place and that it is necessary to nail down exactly what questions > will be asked and why. > > But, as steve said: > " This project has lots of ideas - it also needs people that can > _implement_ ideas! " > > I would love to start, err or continue, developing the interactions for the > security-setup; but, I am confused. > > >From Matthew's first message, I understood that the Freenet devs are > looking for a set-up that asks questions and then shows potential security > options based on the answers to those questions. > > However, from Steve's first message, in this conversation, I believe he is > saying that the answers to the questions will result in only one security > option and since there is only one, there is no need for it to be selected > or unselected so it will be automatically chosen. > > So, I am confused on which implementation Freenet is looking for: > 1.) Questions that result in options > or > 2.) Questions that result in only one-option that is automatically chosen. > But then the user has to entre their security preferences in the form that > appears. > > Please let me know, which option is most popular. > Personally and with my experience, I think the first option is better. That > is, because I can see the user being confused when they see the security > option chosen without them having chosen it. > But, it is the rest of the dev team's call. > > Also, what questions and how many questions are to be asked. I think we > should keep it under 5 if possible.
Yes. That's why we don't want to have NORMAL vs LOW or HIGH vs MAXIMUM. It's an extra question that most users don't need to worry about. The current code just does LOW or HIGH (with some extra options). Users with particular needs should use the old, more detailed wizard (custom settings button). Probably we should warn users about opennet at some point. We probably do that already?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
