On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:24:45PM +0200, Marco Calamari wrote: > On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > This doesn't have anything to do with the Silk Road takedown, if that is > > what you are referring to. > > > > The vulnerability there was "between keyboard and chair". > > ... not only, in this case also in software ... > > 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy > Trawling for Tor Hidden Services: > Detection, Measurement, Deanonymization > Alex Biryukov, Ivan Pustogarov, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann > <http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2013/papers/4977a080.pdf>
Not related to the recent busts AFAICS? There are published attacks on Tor (and on Freenet too). The FBI shut down a tor hidden service. The two are not necessarily connected; most times when something on Tor is attacked it's via javascript/SQL injection/etc. In this case I believe it was largely conventional police work. > > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Robert Hailey > > <rob...@freenetproject.org>wrote: > > > > > > > > Is MITM the right term? > > > > > > Not to be picky... but I thought they just pulled the server that was > > > serving up those particular hidden services and dropped in a new server > > > with the "identify all users" exploit [if they were not controlling that > > > server in the first place :-) ].
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
