The dark background is fine. Functionally the current setting ain't that bad, and aside of that the dark background is a nice change. Consider that one aspect of beauty is rarity and relations: If everything looks alike (white background) across the internet, then that look is not interesting or beautiful, but boring average.
Greetings, Torben Lechner --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Ian <i...@locut.us> Datum: 06.11.2015 22:55:46 An: x...@freenetproject.org Betreff: Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:33 PM, xor <x...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > On Thursday, November 05, 2015 03:35:30 PM Ian wrote: > > > Really? It looks nothing like a typical Bootstrap site. I think > it > > might > > > have been better to stick much more closely to the standard Bootstrap > CSS > > > (eg. light background). > > > > With regards to "light background": We won't ever win this > situation. > > We had a light background, so people complained we should get a dark > one. > > > > I don't know who these "people" are that advocated for a dark background, > but almost no other popular website on the Internet has a dark background > and light text, likely because it makes the site difficult to read (which > is the feedback we've been getting). > > Now we have a dark one, and people complain we should get a light one. > > This IMHO is just a matter of taste, both are equally valid. > > > > If both were equally valid, then how come almost no popular website on the > Internet has a dark background? > > Ian. > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl@freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
