On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:50 AM, <hyazin...@emailn.de> wrote: > >I'm pretty sure that isn't true. Not only does it not make any > sense whatsoever, but I can't find anything to back that up. Can you > support that claim? > > >That's not true. > > Both proven: > > http://youtube-global.blogspot.de/2011/03/were-turning-off-our-lights-in-honor-of.html
Your statement: Youtube does dark background for saving energy once a year. Reality: Youtube did this once in 2011 for an hour, not to save energy (because this isn't how LCD screens work), but as a gesture. simply claiming an argument to be not convincing and pushing it close to > factual incorrectness is a knockout argument, > and rather reveals insistence on being right disquised as factual > argumentation, than being valuable for getting a discourse forward. > That sentence doesn't make any more sense than anything else you've said. Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
