Am Sonntag, 8. November 2015, 08:55:50 schrieb Ian: > I didn't choose not to bring this up earlier, my opinion is based in-part > on the feedback that we only received after the site went live. That > prompted me to do some research on color schemes which solidified my view > that light on dark hurts readability.
If this is just the result of doing research now, then I wouldn’t consider it consolidated — especially not consolidated enough to topple all the design-work done on the new design and begin something completely different. For design it’s not enough to just read some studies. You wouldn’t tell me that I cannot design a wind-turbine in a given way after reading a few articles about physics, right? Light on dark or dark on light is a minor point. A well designed bright on dark site beats any half-assed dark on bright site. A good bright on dark colorscheme beats any mediocre dark on bright colorscheme. So please let us stop the bikeshedding discussion. We’re working on realizing the important points of the feedback — for example “your download page does not ask me to download the software” and “I don’t understand how your tool helps me in the first 10 seconds”. Best wishes, Arne -- Ich hab' nichts zu verbergen – hab ich gedacht: - http://draketo.de/licht/lieder/ich-hab-nichts-zu-verbergen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
