Am Samstag, 28. November 2015, 14:52:23 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> But then Freenet was always just one piece of the puzzle - a
> research project really.

I don’t think people contributed or donated for that. Also, and I
agree with earlier complaints about that, a research project does not
need an auto-updater, content-filters, support for websites, forums, a
full-fledged client-protocol, and so forth.

I say it so clearly, because I think that calling Freenet a research
project is harming the project.

Either we’re a research project, then we can strip out most of the
features in Freenet, tell our users that we don’t care about them and
let Freenet be replaced by the newest results of sensor network
research, or we’re a project which aims at providing the technical
foundation for freedom of the press, then we need to make Freenet easy
to use und robust, and we need to know and communicate for whom it can
already provide reasonable security.

> The problem with darknet is that Freenet is not socially acceptable
> and is technically challenging (it effectively requires a dedicated
> always on system), and currently is slow and inconvenient. There are
> lots of relatively easy ways we can improve the last point. The
> first is hard.

Technically challenging can be solved by making it easier to join —
all that is documented in the bugtracker. For *more* socially
acceptable we need more actively spidering indizes which only include
what the creator deems acceptable (nerdageddon does not count since it
does not spider itself). However, Freenet as “if you want to avoid
censorship, no one must be able to censor” is pretty acceptable.

> I have no idea what you mean by "node pinning".

I guess it could be either reconnecting through old opennet peers, or
reusing the same seednode. Both would make it harder to start new
attacks against opennet users (as in “it would make it slower”).

Best wishes,
Arne

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to