On Thursday, August 04, 2016 02:36:25 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Ian Clarke writes: > > I disagree, and you had more than enough opportunity to offer your > > feedback > > on this proposed approach months ago when I first proposed it. > > I did provide feedback. You rejected it and accused me of attacking you. > > I actually spent a lot of time trying to help improve the proposal, and > I feel that all that effort was wasted.
I can understand both of your perspectives. However there is a solution to your disagreement which doesn't require any of you to change your opinion: We could realize that we haven't even completed this type of poll procedure yet and thus don't even know whether it will fail. - Maybe it will produce results which the both of you are happy with! :) So how about we just try the procedure as is, and postpone requests for a different one until it is finished and has actually failed obviously? -- hopstolive (keyword for Ians spam filter)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
