On Thursday, August 04, 2016 11:12:45 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > x...@freenetproject.org writes: > > So how about we just try the procedure as is, and postpone requests for a > > different one until it is finished and has actually failed obviously? > > As you saw, I did answer to the poll. And I provided concrete > suggestions how we can try to get the most value from the poll. > > That should already give enough of a hint how I’m taking it. Even where > I don’t agree with how specifics are planned.
I did not intend to doubt your willingness to contribute to it :) I merely wanted to help the two of you to make your discussion easier to resolve. > I think that asking the community is a good thing, even though I don’t > think we’re doing it as well as possible, and even though I don’t think > that trying to use that as direct input for a decision algorithm is a > good idea. Well, it has already been mentioned by some of our core contributors that they don't want to consider the poll results as set in stone. So I hope there is no need to worry about wrong decisions yet :) I'm also willing to produce multiple different spreadsheets as output of the poll, using different subsets of the input or maybe even a different algorithm. So we can still try different approaches afterwards with the same data.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
