Ian Clarke writes: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> > wrote: > >> >> Ian writes: >> > Please be more specific. You've said a lot of things, most of which I >> > found unpersuasive or just plain obstructionist. >> >> This is roughly how you reacted to what I said. Did you assume good faith? >> > > You ignored my request to explain which criticisms of the process you're > referring to and instead are attempting to deflect it into some kind of > meta-discussion, in which I have little interest.
Do you mean now or when I gave feedback on the process back when you proposed it? When I gave constructive feedback (in the style of "this is likely to cause problems, it could be amended by that"), you accused me of being obstructionist — back then and now again. That’s not a climate in which I want to explain more. You complained that I did not write my comments again when you asked whether we can proceed. Why should I have? You brushed them off once, so I expected that you’d ignore them again, but restarting the discussion would still have dragged out the process. Best wishes, Arne
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
