fwiw github appears to support markdown mediawiki and a few others:
https://github.com/github/markup

On 10/08/16 11:00, Dean Shannon wrote:
> My 2 cents...
> 
> The wiki is definitely one of the most important places to find
> information in any project. I think it would be a major boost to the
> freenet project to have a nice functional wiki.
> 
> On 10/08/16 08:53, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>
>> Ian writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don’t think that’s a fair assessment — Mediawiki syntax is pretty
>>>> decent and nicely full-featured — and I don’t think that markup matters
>>>> that much in this. Markdown is nice, but the difference isn’t that big
>>>> (I used to think different but changed my stance with experience).
>>>>
>>>> Transitioning simply is a lot of very boring work, and there are lots of
>>>> corner cases which don’t work by default.
>>>
>>> I acknowledge that it might not be easy, but you acknowledge that we didn't
>>> even complete the last wiki migration.  Github is easy to use, and its wiki
>>> syntax is very familiar to people.  I think that will be a better place for
>>> us to be ultimately.  I really dislike the idea of us running our own web
>>> servers, we're just begging to be hacked or to hit a scalability wall.
>>>
> 
> I agree with ian here, github is familiar to everyone at the project and
> has a fairly easy workflow. I think a project which is occasionally
> broke should avoid any extra cost eg hosting as much as possible. It
> should be noted that I do not claim to an expert in any wiki languages
> so the technical debate is out of my scope.
> 
>>> If volunteers are unwilling to do it, then we could pick the most important
>>> pages and pay someone to migrate them.  People competent in that kind of
>>> work can be hired quite cheaply.
>>
>> If we only needed to port a few "most important pages", transitioning
>> wouldn’t be an issue. But we have a wiki. That’s not some kind of PR
>> page but a knowledge base with a lot of information about many different
>> parts of Freenet.
>>
>> Also Mediawiki syntax is just as familiar to people as Markdown — rather
>> more so.
>>
>> I don’t know what is there to acknowledge from my side about not
>> completing the last transition. I put it up, and it would be strange if
>> I were to acknowledge my own argument.
>>
>> To say more clearly why it’s an argument: It still happens from time to
>> time that information which was in the old wiki is needed but not
>> available in the new wiki. Every incomplete transition throws away
>> information our users and potential developers need. If there’s no one
>> who pledges to transition the whole wiki — and has a history of
>> delivering on his or her pledges — then a transition to a new wiki is a
>> recipe for failure. We’d either lose important information or we’d have
>> two Wikis to maintain.
>>
>> That’s it. I gave my arguments. I won’t argument this further. We’re
>> moving in circles and different from the website where I said "not now"
>> and not "we should not", I won’t start seeing a wiki transition as
>> useful just because arguments are repeated.
>>
>> As long as there is no one who pledges to transition the whole wiki and
>> has a history of delivering on his or her pledges, transitioning the wiki
>> is a dumb idea.
>>
> 
> Ive wanted to help with the wiki for a while now but hit a technical
> wall once I started considering it and read the notes that a copy/paste
> transition was not ideal. I did not understand freenet internals well
> enough to migrate it properly.
> 
> I still would like to help but I do not have time for a full transition
> (I work full time and am at uni part time). I can see Arnes argument
> that 3 partial transitions obviously makes it harder for anybody to find
> anything.
> 
> Maybe we could set up a small team of volunteers to migrate it? Would
> anyone be keen? I think a copy/paste initial transition would be the
> only way to get started ie theres just too much info and it appears that
> only toad actually understands it all
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Dean (rdrofthestorm on github)
> 
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to