On Sunday, November 27, 2016 09:18:36 PM Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 27/11/16 21:08, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > > That's OK, here's what happened: > > While most participants of the poll from IRC have been known in the > > community for years, 70% of the anonymous FMS participants created their > > identity within a month of the poll's announcement, as measured by my > > instance of FMS which has been running for years. > > > > Now one might say that this is conclusive enough and I should just publish > > the results without the sybils. > > Yes, you should. Give the process a chance. Don't get me wrong, I will put out the results as just promised to Ian! :) I just don't feel like doing it this week before people discussed this thread.
But: So I put out results which exclude the sybils. Then there are 9 voters left. 9 against > 712 of the uservoice poll. Why don't we use the uservoice poll then? As said, I'm happy to continue working towards its winner (filesharing), I've been doing that for 8 years... Is there *any* possible, scientific reason for letting a vote of 9 people be preferred towards one of 712? > > So we repeat this 70 times now or what? > > I'd be very surprised if $25K got that far... Yea, that's the next problem, all the discussions will waste so much of our precious funds :| The amount of money we have doesn't even last a year of paying a programmer, and we're shooting at it with a procedure which has already caused a delay of 7 of the 12 months of funding we have. If that isn't overengineered then I don't know what is :|
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
