On Tuesday, December 06, 2016 06:49:04 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > It’s been over a week now, could you please post the data with or > without the evaluation?
I offered something like that at both the beginning and the end of my reply to Ian the last week and got no "Yes, do it" from him. Nevertheless if he doesn't reply to the mail within a day, I will assume he wants that and this week allocate a day for finishing the evaluation as I consider it reasonable and publish it then. Meanwhile, please refrain from your attempts to make me throw away days of work of manually putting the stuff into spreadsheets, reviewing and coloring it, etc., just so you can replace it with scripts which will be blind for all the things a manual evaluation is not blind for. You can run your scripts on the raw data afterwards, but I really don't feel like throwing away days of my work in favor of simplistic scripts. I *am* thankful for your efforts, but I doubt they'd spot the borderline- fraudulent data which a human can clearly see. Please be aware that the spreadsheets *do* contain some of your suggestions already such as median, standard deviation, etc., so your work is not neglected either :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
