ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > In principle the F2F way seems closest to what we need. Though it has > the downsides of limited performance and probably complicated to > automate since a noderef needs to be exchanged out of band first.
If that’s what you want to go for and you want to increase performance with the currently available tools (no changes needed, so nothing blocks doing this today), you could run multiple low-bandwidth nodes on the gateway and configure them to connect to the node on the client. At 5 friend-to-friend connections Freenet pure friend-to-friend performance starts to get pretty good. The configuration can be done via pyFreenet. See our update over mandatory test script for an example of connecting two nodes: https://github.com/freenet/scripts/blob/b56225bedcc646a8ba88f04862e89f15e246d4b8/test-autoupgrade#L150 I’m running such a setup myself to have a pure darknet node (to dogfod with how Freenet works for users who disable opennet for security reasons) which still gets pretty good performance if most friends are offline. > I'm thinking some of Freenet supporting an explicit 'proxy mode' where > it would provide a SOCKS interface for Freenet on the workstation to > use for outbound connections. Isn’t that what happens with SSH port-forwarding? What am I missing? Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
