x...@freenetproject.org writes: > On Saturday, January 28, 2017 04:57:58 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> PS: Finishing the first iteration of the WoT would normally be among >> these two (with estimated 2.8 to 4.1 weeks ~ 2800$ to 4100$), but xor >> pulled back his votes on that, so I won’t name it here until the >> issue is resolved. That need not block the two tasks named here. >… > Also, for future discussions, please explicitly mention it when you're using > the results from your custom evaluation algorithm,
I said something along the lines of "with any evaluation method". The email I wrote about the different methods stated, that the way I used to aggregate the results was to find a set of results which are top ranked regardless of the method. > It's just that the procedure of a "democratic" vote should be clearly > predefined and not implicitly changed when stating results. It wasn’t clearly predefined and what was written was easy to game. That’s why I implemented several evaluations to find a stable set of top-ranked elements which does not depend on the evaluation method and is more resilient against gaming. Finally: I am somewhat cranky, because I have the impression that you’re missing the point why I did the different evaluations. But I won’t push that further. No need to stay cranky, there are more important things to do. Like deciding on the offers. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
