> > The intention is not to make anyone work harder, but if people did want > > to start working on features that won't make it into 0.3 (subspaces > > being a good example) > > Shouldn't stuff like subspaces be completed in Serapis first, and then > put into the node?
Is there any need for a simulation of subspaces - surely their behaviour is well-understood? What potential do you see for subspaces not working that would be addressed by a simulation first? Ian. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
