On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 10:58:03AM -0500, david at aminal.com wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 10:50:17AM +0700, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > > It's not that the code is not stable, it's been more or less stable all > > along (more thanks to Java then to us), but that the system is not > > stable. I don't feel like running off to put in things like searching and > > updating until we know that the the very most basic thing - asking for a > > key and getting the data back, works next to perfectly. > > > > > > Bravo! > > Since there isn't a marketing department, no reason to catch > Featuritis. >
I just wanted to point out that I wasn't complaining, griping, or criticizing, just stating why I thought things were working (and working pretty damn well, I might add) the way they are. Like Oskar, I think the reason to be involved is because Freenet (and other anti-censorship efforts) is *important*. Critically so. This isn't a project that is driven by egoboo. And it shouldn't be. So, let the people who have the time, capability, and resources do as much as they can, and don't worry too much about accomodating the rest of us who'd like to 'feel like we're making a contribution' :-) D Schutt _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
