On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote:
> Adam Langley <agl at linuxpower.org> writes:
> 
> > Maybe Rambling Sytem is too abstract - but the fixed feilds system
> > is too concrete.
> 
> I agree that it would be nice to figure out how we're going to deal
> with adding fields to keys in the future.  Your system isn't the
> answer, though.

I think Adam's syntax could use some improvements, but overall I like
it as it's very sensibly organized.  It's useful to think of the requests
in terms of function calls even if you don't end up putting parentheses
in the URI.

Anyway, I think we need something this flexible while keeping the URI
syntax as readable as possible.

-- 

# tavin cole
# if code is law, then Freenet is a crowded theater


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to