Tavin Cole <tavin at mailandnews.com> writes: > First, what are the goals we're trying to achieve with the URI standard? > Here is everything I can think of (I realize not everyone shares all > of these goals). The ordering is not by importance. > > 1. backwards compatibility
This would be nice, but isn't strictly necessary, seeing as how we're still pre-1.0 and all. > 2. ability to encode meta-information such as DBRs or MSKs I'm not interested in encoding meta-information at all. I'm only interested in DBRs. I see them as being more related to the key itself, and there are tangible benefits to encoding them in the key. -S _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Sun Apr 15 14:51:09 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
